Client Access

Executive Compensation Planning and the Closing Window

Professional office desk with a calendar highlighting an important date
By Frank Lovaglio, RFC® · Managing Partner, Security Financial Management · CRD #1299700
Reviewed by Dave Allen, CFP® · CRD #1210763 · Published September 2026 · Last reviewed September 2026
Securities offered through Kestra Investment Services, LLC, member FINRA/SIPC (Kestra IS). Investment advisory services offered through Kestra Advisory Services, LLC (Kestra AS). Security Financial Management, Bluespring Wealth Partners, LLC, Kestra IS and Kestra AS are affiliated through common ownership by Kestra Holdings.

Executive Compensation Planning and the Closing Window

Most equity decisions are locked in before the numbers that would justify them become visible.

Executive compensation planning is often mistaken for the discipline of timing one exercise well: choosing the right year, the right price, the right bracket. While a well-timed exercise may lower the tax due in a given year, it does not automatically ensure that the vesting schedule, the deferral elections and the eventual sale of the business are working from a single plan. When those decisions occur in isolation from one another, coordination failure can develop across the years that matter most.

The Thinking Pattern: Single Variable Focus

The pattern that shows up most often in this work is Single Variable Focus, the tendency to optimize one number while the system around it goes unexamined. In equity compensation the chosen number is almost always the tax rate at exercise. It is a reasonable thing to focus on: it is measurable, it is immediate, and it responds to action in a way that most of a financial plan does not.

What makes it a planning illusion rather than a preference is the confidence it produces. An executive who has modeled the rate carefully tends to feel the question is settled, because the part that was legible has been handled well. The vesting cadence, the share of net worth sitting in one employer, the year an election had to be filed: none of these arrives as a number on a statement, so none competes for attention. The result is not carelessness. It is a well-analyzed decision made inside a frame drawn too narrowly to hold the consequence.

The Structural Pattern: Coordination Failure

Underneath the thinking sits an architectural problem. Coordination Failure describes what happens when independent decisions operate without integration, and executive compensation is unusually exposed to it, because the elections that govern the outcome are set by different parties in different years, and most of them cannot be revisited.

A Section 83(b) election must be filed no later than 30 days after the property is transferred.1 A restricted stock unit offers no election at all: because nothing has been transferred at grant, an RSU is not property under Section 83, so no 83(b) election can be made, and the income is recognized when the shares are delivered.2 A deferred compensation election must generally be made before the close of the preceding taxable year, which means committing before the year that produces the income has begun.3 An incentive stock option carries a two-year holding period from grant and one year from transfer of the share.4 Four instruments, four separate clocks, and no calendar on which they appear together.

What This Means

Read together, the two patterns explain a specific kind of surprise. The behavioral pattern directs attention to the one variable that behaves like a decision, and the structural pattern ensures that the variables which were never examined are the ones that had deadlines. By the time the numbers are visible enough to justify a choice, the elections that governed them have generally closed.

This is why the same executive can be both well advised and poorly positioned. Each individual decision withstands scrutiny. The exercise was timed sensibly, the deferral was elected for defensible reasons, the buy-sell agreement was drafted by a competent attorney. What was never held in one view was the sequence, and the sequence is where the household actually lives: which years carry the income, which carry the concentration, and which carry the transition out of the business.

Strategic Perspective

Institutions that manage concentrated, election-driven compensation treat the calendar as a design problem rather than an annual question. They start from the dates that cannot move and reason backwards, because a decision carrying a filing deadline is not really a decision about tax but a decision about sequence, made under a constraint that arrived before the information did.

In Connelly v. United States, decided in June 2024, the Supreme Court held that a corporation’s obligation to redeem a deceased shareholder’s shares did not offset the life-insurance proceeds funding that redemption, so those proceeds counted in the company’s value for estate tax.5 The agreement had been drafted years earlier to keep the business in the family. It did that, and produced a valuation the owners had not planned for.

The goal of executive compensation planning is not a lower tax bill at exercise. It is coordinating the equity schedule, the deferral elections, and the business exit.

This article examines a pattern observed across households holding equity compensation and closely held business interests. It describes how these situations are analyzed and does not recommend a course of action for any particular reader.

Wednesday’s Resource turns this into a working reference — what each instrument requires, and the date each choice stops being available.

Continue with the September Executive Compensation pillar

Sources

  1. 26 CFR §1.83-2(b) — “the election … shall be filed not later than 30 days after the date the property was transferred.” ecfr.gov
  2. IRS Office of Chief Counsel Memorandum AM 2020-004 — an RSU is not property for §83 purposes at grant, so no §83(b) election may be made; income is includible when the shares are delivered. irs.gov
  3. 26 U.S.C. §409A(a)(4)(B) — “the election to defer such compensation is made not later than the close of the preceding taxable year.” law.cornell.edu
  4. 26 U.S.C. §422(a)(1) — “no disposition of such share is made … within 2 years from the date of the granting of the option nor within 1 year after the transfer of such share.” law.cornell.edu
  5. Connelly v. United States, No. 23-146 (U.S. June 6, 2024). supremecourt.gov

About the Author

Frank Lovaglio, RFC® · Managing Partner, Security Financial Management. CRD #1299700. Frank has guided multigenerational families through coordinated retirement and estate planning since 1989. Verify credentials at BrokerCheck by FINRA or SEC IAPD.

Third-Party Recognitions

AdvisorHub 2025 Advisors to Watch, Over $1B: A recognition based on AdvisorHub’s proprietary criteria published in 2025. SFM did not pay cash or non-cash compensation for consideration in this rating. Third-party recognitions are not indicative of any client’s experience and do not guarantee future performance.

Dave Ramsey SmartVestor Pro: SmartVestor Pros pay a fee to participate in the Ramsey Solutions referral program. Being listed as a SmartVestor Pro is not an endorsement of SFM or Frank Lovaglio by Dave Ramsey or Ramsey Solutions, and does not represent client outcomes.

Disclosures

The information presented is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice. Security Financial Management, Inc. is a registered investment advisor under Kestra Advisory Services, LLC. The election deadlines, holding periods and limits referenced are set by the Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulations and are subject to legislative and regulatory change. Equity compensation, deferred compensation and business succession decisions should be coordinated with qualified tax professionals and, where appropriate, legal counsel familiar with your specific situation. Nothing here is a recommendation to exercise, hold, sell or defer any award. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Securities offered through Kestra Investment Services, LLC, member FINRA/SIPC (Kestra IS). Investment advisory services offered through Kestra Advisory Services, LLC (Kestra AS). Security Financial Management, Bluespring Wealth Partners, LLC, Kestra IS and Kestra AS are affiliated through common ownership by Kestra Holdings. Verify advisor credentials at BrokerCheck by FINRA or SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure.